Tori Kinard vs Maree Teiwa Casey Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Kinard 1 - 0 Casey

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kinard has won 43.71% of points on their second serve, while Casey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kinard, in recent form, has won 54.27% of their opponent's second serve points, while Casey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.17% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: Kinard has saved 44.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Casey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year Kinard has won 36.36% of matches played (W/L 8/ 14), with Casey winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: Kinard has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 22/ 17), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 128/ 162). Casey has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 12/ 21).
• Player level: In the last year, Kinard has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 10), where as Casey has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kinard winning 1 times and Casey being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kinard winning 2 and Casey winning 0. The last match between Kinard and Casey was at the Melbourne, 07-04-2014, First, Clay with Tori Kinard getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: Kinard and Casey have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kinard winning 0 times and Casey 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kinard winning 0, and Casey 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kinard has played against opponents with an average rank of 251.41 while Casey has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kinard has won 17% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Casey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, Kinard has converted 48.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Casey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)